Best Bang for Buck? Bilstein 6112 vs Icon EXP vs OME MT64
Posted by Brandon Sevestre on
Each of these three shocks improve handling and ride quality over the stock suspension, but each caters to specific needs.
What's Similar?
- Similar monotube design for consistent performance
- Similar 60-64mm piston size for optimal control
- Circlip adjustable for preload/ride height
Key Differences
- Icon 2.5 EXP: Works with stock springs, offering lift and potentially more travel (better for rough terrain).
- Bilstein 6100s/6112s: Designed for Bilstein springs. 6112 offers more lift and adjustability. Steel bodies are strong but harder to rebuild.
- OME MT64s: Made for OME lifted springs. Include multiple height settings and a built-in bump stop for vehicles with extra weight. Aluminum bodies are lightweight but may not be as tough.
Who is Built to Last?
- Icon & OME: Aluminum bodies with reinforced ends (lighter, resist rust, and better for heat dissipation, aka less fade).
- Bilstein: Steel body (strongest).
Ride Feel
- OME & Bilstein: Comfortable and durable rubber bushings.
- Icon: Smoother-operating spherical bearings (may wear out faster and create more noise).
Maintenance
- Icon: Needs service most often (around 40,000 miles) but easiest to fix.
- Bilstein: Lasts a very long time, but rebuilding is difficult.
- OME: Likely similar lifespan to Bilstein and can be rebuilt easily if seals become readily available.
Best Value?
- Bilstein: Most affordable, especially considering springs are included.
Choosing the Right Shock
- Hauling heavy loads: OME (designed for constant extra weight)
- Fast off-road driving: Icon (tuned for aggressive handling)
- Daily driving and occasional off-roading: Bilstein (good balance of performance and comfort)
The Bottom Line
- Heavy Loads: OME
- High Speed Off-Road: Icon
- Daily Driving / weekend adventures/ Jack of All Trades: Bilstein